How Streaming Money Actually Reaches Artists

Introduction

Streaming money reaches artists through a chain, not a simple “play count equals cash” formula. A stream usually creates value for at least two copyrights: the sound recording, often controlled by a label, distributor or artist, and the composition, controlled by songwriters and publishers. Platforms place subscription and advertising revenue into territory-specific royalty pools, allocate shares according to listening, then pay rights holders. Artists are paid only after contracts, distribution fees, publishing splits, recoupment and collecting-society rules have done their work. That is why two artists with the same number of streams can receive very different amounts. Streaming has made recorded music more global and measurable, but it has also made payment harder to understand because the money passes through rights, territories, intermediaries and scale before it becomes artist income. [Spotify for Artists]artists.spotify.comSpotify for ArtistsRoyalties GuideWe pay rightsholders based on streamshare — their share of total streams in a given month. E.g., if an… 2themlc.com

The stream creates two separate royalty paths

A common misunderstanding is that “the artist” is paid directly by Spotify, Apple Music, Deezer or another streaming platform every time a listener presses play. In most cases, the platform pays rights holders, not the performer personally. The money then travels through contracts and administration systems before reaching the people who made the music. Spotify’s own royalties guide says it pays rights holders based on “streamshare” in a given month and country, with roughly two-thirds of its music revenue allocated to recording and publishing royalties. [Spotify for Artists]artists.spotify.comSpotify for ArtistsRoyalties GuideWe pay rightsholders based on streamshare — their share of total streams in a given month. E.g., if an…

The key split is between two copyrights:

• The sound recording, sometimes called the master, is the specific recorded version listeners hear. Money from this side normally goes to a record label, distributor, or artist-owned company. It then reaches performers according to their recording contract, distribution deal or ownership share.
• The composition is the underlying song: melody, lyrics and musical work. Money from this side goes to songwriters, composers and publishers through publishing administrators, collecting societies or mechanical-licensing bodies.

This means a singer who performs a song but did not write it may earn from the recording side but not the composition side. A songwriter who wrote the track but did not perform on it may earn publishing royalties without receiving master-recording income. A self-releasing artist who writes, records and owns everything can collect both sides, but only if the correct registrations and distribution routes are in place.

Recording royalties move through labels and distributors

On the recording side, interactive streaming services such as Spotify and Apple Music usually pay whoever controls the master rights. For a major-label act, that is normally the label. For an independent artist, it may be a distributor such as DistroKid, TuneCore, CD Baby, AWAL, Believe or an artist-owned label account. The service calculates the amount due to that rights holder, pays it through the agreed licence and reporting process, and the rights holder then accounts to the artist.

This is where contracts matter. One artist may own their master and pay a distributor a small fee or percentage. Another may have assigned rights to a label in exchange for an advance, marketing, recording costs and campaign support. In the second case, the artist’s royalty may be reduced by recoupment, meaning the label first uses the artist’s share of income to recover agreed costs before additional cash flows to the artist. Spotify stresses that the royalties it pays to rights holders are separate from the artist-label contract that determines how much the artist ultimately receives. [Spotify for Artists]artists.spotify.comSpotify for ArtistsRoyalties GuideWe pay rightsholders based on streamshare — their share of total streams in a given month. E.g., if an…

This is one reason headline platform payouts can be misleading. Spotify reported paying more than US$10 billion to the music industry in 2024, while later industry reporting put its 2025 payout above US$11 billion, but those figures refer to payments to music rights holders, not direct wages to every performer. [Financial Times]ft.comSource details in endnotes.

Publishing royalties travel through a different system

The composition side is more fragmented because song rights are often split between several writers, publishers and collection bodies. In the United States, the Mechanical Licensing Collective administers blanket mechanical licences for eligible streaming and download services, collects digital audio mechanical royalties and pays publishers, administrators, collective management organisations and self-administered songwriters who have registered with it. [themlc.com]themlc.comThe Digital Music Royalties LandscapeThe MLC collects digital audio mechanical royalties from eligible streaming and download services in…

Interactive streams also generate performance royalties for the composition. Spotify’s explanation of the Mechanical Licensing Collective notes that every interactive stream on a digital service creates two songwriter royalties: a mechanical royalty for the digital reproduction of the work and a performance royalty for the digital performance of that work. [Spotify for Artists]artists.spotify.comSpotify for ArtistsRoyalties GuideWe pay rightsholders based on streamshare — their share of total streams in a given month. E.g., if an…

Outside the United States, collecting societies and publishers perform similar but not identical roles. In the UK, PRS for Music licenses uses of members’ works, collects royalties and pays members for music use in the UK and through representation agreements with societies in other countries. [PRS for Music]prsformusic.comSource details in endnotes.

The practical consequence is simple but important: a creator may be earning money in places they have not properly registered to collect from. A songwriter who only uploads music through a distributor may collect master income but miss publishing income unless their songs are registered with the right publishing administrator or society.

Revenue pools decide the starting amount

Streaming services usually do not pay a fixed rate per stream. The familiar idea that a stream is “worth” a precise amount is a rough after-the-fact average, not the mechanism that sets payment. The dominant model is based on revenue share. A platform collects money from subscriptions and advertising, keeps its share, allocates the rest to royalty pools, and divides those pools according to listening share. [Spotify for Artists]artists.spotify.comSpotify for ArtistsRoyalties GuideWe pay rightsholders based on streamshare — their share of total streams in a given month. E.g., if an…

Spotify describes this as streamshare: if an artist accounts for 1% of streams in a particular country, that artist’s selected rights holders receive 1% of the recording royalties Spotify pays in that country. This is why a million streams in one market may not produce the same recording revenue as a million streams in another. The relevant pool depends on local subscription prices, advertising revenue, currency, taxes, platform mix and the total number of streams competing for the same money. [Spotify for Artists]artists.spotify.comSpotify for ArtistsRoyalties GuideWe pay rightsholders based on streamshare — their share of total streams in a given month. E.g., if an…

Subscription and ad-supported listening do not pay the same

A stream from a paying subscriber and a stream from an ad-supported listener can both generate royalties, but they are not backed by the same revenue. Subscription markets generally produce more predictable income because users pay monthly fees. Advertising-supported listening depends on ad demand, local ad prices and how much revenue the service earns from free users.

That difference matters at global scale. IFPI reported that global recorded music revenues reached US$29.6 billion in 2024, with streaming accounting for a dominant share and paid subscriptions continuing to grow. Its 2026 report then put 2025 global recorded music revenues at US$31.7 billion, with paid streaming remaining the main growth driver and paid subscription streaming representing more than half of total recorded music revenue. [IFPICR]ifpicr.czglobal music report 2025global music report 2025

For artists, the lesson is not simply “get more streams”. It is also “where are those streams coming from, and what kind of users are generating them?” A large audience in high-subscription markets can produce a different outcome from a larger number of lower-revenue ad-supported plays elsewhere.

Territories can change the value of the same song

Streaming is global, but royalties are calculated through localised rights and markets. A track may be streamed in London, Lagos, São Paulo, Jakarta and Los Angeles on the same day, yet the money behind those plays can differ sharply. Subscription prices are not uniform across countries. Advertising markets vary. Local licensing terms and currency conversion can also affect the final pool.

This can help artists who build international audiences, but it also makes their income less intuitive. Spotify said that, in 2024, more than half of the artists who generated at least US$1,000 in royalties on the platform earned the majority of those royalties from listeners outside their home country. Around a third received more than 75% of their royalties from outside their home markets. [Spotify]artists.spotify.comSpotify for ArtistsRoyalties GuideWe pay rightsholders based on streamshare — their share of total streams in a given month. E.g., if an…

That global reach is one of streaming’s genuine strengths. A niche artist no longer needs a local radio breakthrough or physical distribution in every market to reach listeners abroad. But the payment outcome still depends on the size and value of each territory’s pool, not a universal per-play tariff.

Contracts decide what reaches the artist

Once the platform has paid the relevant rights holder, the artist’s actual income depends on the deal sitting underneath the music. This is where public debates about streaming often become confused. A platform payout, a label receipt, a distributor statement and an artist’s personal income are not the same thing.

An independent artist who owns their master and uses a distributor may receive most of the master-side income after the distributor’s fee or commission. A label-signed artist may receive a royalty percentage after deductions and recoupment. A featured artist, producer or session musician may have a separate agreement. A songwriter may receive publishing income through a publisher, administrator or collecting society. A performer who did not write the song may not receive publishing royalties at all.

The UK Parliament’s Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee inquiry into the economics of music streaming highlighted this imbalance in 2021, arguing that reform was needed to address how streaming revenues were shared among performers, songwriters, composers and larger industry intermediaries. The UK government later maintained an ongoing work programme on streaming issues, including transparency, metadata and creator remuneration. [UK Parliament Committees]committees.parliament.ukSource details in endnotes.

The central tension remains: streaming has grown the recorded music market, but the growth does not automatically arrive evenly in musicians’ bank accounts. Rights ownership and contract terms can matter as much as popularity.

Recoupment can delay payment even when streams are strong

Many record deals involve advances. An advance is money paid upfront to support recording, living costs, marketing or promotion, but it is usually recoupable from the artist’s future royalties. If an artist has not recouped, the label may receive streaming income from the platform while the artist sees little or no additional royalty cash beyond the advance already paid.

This does not mean the streams have earned nothing. It means the earnings are being used to repay the agreed balance. The artist may still benefit from exposure, marketing, tour growth or catalogue value, but the recording royalty may not yet appear as new cash.

This distinction matters because streaming statements can be discouraging without context. A signed artist may have millions of plays and still be recouping. An independent artist with fewer streams may keep a larger share because they own the recording and have lower deductions. The play count alone does not reveal the economics.

Distribution deals can be simpler, but they are not automatic

For self-releasing artists, digital distributors have made it much easier to place music on major platforms. But uploading a track is not the same as collecting every possible royalty. The distributor normally handles master-side delivery and accounting. Publishing, songwriter splits, neighbouring rights and non-interactive digital performance royalties may need separate registrations.

SoundExchange, for example, collects and distributes digital performance royalties for sound recordings played on non-interactive digital radio in the United States, such as certain internet radio and satellite radio uses. That is separate from the on-demand Spotify-style master royalty and separate again from songwriter performance royalties collected by organisations such as ASCAP, BMI, SESAC or PRS-type societies. [SoundExchange]soundexchange.comSource details in endnotes.

For a working artist, the practical map is therefore:

Missing one of these routes can mean money sits unclaimed, is delayed, or is paid to the wrong party until metadata and ownership data are corrected.

Platform rules can change who earns

Streaming systems are not static. Platforms can change eligibility rules, anti-fraud policies and payout structures. These rules affect which plays count, how money is allocated and what kind of activity is rewarded.

Spotify announced that from early 2024, tracks must have reached at least 1,000 streams in the previous 12 months to generate recorded royalties. The company framed this as a way to redirect tiny payments and reduce gaming of the system, but the change also illustrates a wider reality: platform rules can determine whether low-level listening turns into payable income. [Spotify for Artists]artists.spotify.comSpotify for ArtistsRoyalties GuideWe pay rightsholders based on streamshare — their share of total streams in a given month. E.g., if an…

Deezer has moved in a different direction with its Artist-Centric Payment System. Deezer’s explanation says the traditional market-share model pays artists according to their proportion of total platform streams and that this can benefit popular artists and genres over smaller local or niche acts. Its artist-centric model is designed to reward artists who build consistent listener engagement and to reduce the value of noise, fraud and low-quality functional content. [Deezer Support]support.deezer.comSupport Artist-Centric Payment Model (ACPSSupport Artist-Centric Payment Model (ACPS

SoundCloud’s fan-powered royalties offer another alternative for eligible independent artists. Instead of placing all listener revenue into one large pool, the model is designed so a fan’s listening supports the artists that fan actually plays. SoundCloud has promoted it as a way for independent artists with dedicated audiences to earn more than they might under a pure pooled model. [SoundCloud Help Center]help.soundcloud.comSource details in endnotes.

These alternatives do not remove the complexity of rights ownership, but they show that the payment model itself is contested. The debate is not just about how much streaming services pay; it is also about which listening behaviour should be rewarded.

Why scale changes the outcome

Streaming income is unusually sensitive to scale because small per-stream averages only become meaningful when multiplied across large, repeated listening. This is why the same system can look transformative for one artist and negligible for another.

At the top end, streaming can generate substantial rights-holder revenue. Spotify’s 2025 Loud & Clear data said more than 1,500 artists generated over US$1 million in royalties from Spotify alone, while Music Business Worldwide reported that 80 artists generated more than US$10 million each from Spotify in 2025. [Loud and Clear]loudandclear.byspotify.comLoud and Clear TakeawaysLoud and Clear Takeaways

But those figures describe the upper layers of a vast catalogue economy. They also refer to royalties generated for rights holders connected to an artist’s music, not necessarily the artist’s personal take-home income. For emerging and mid-level acts, the more relevant question is often not “Can streaming pay?” but “At what scale, under what ownership structure, and alongside what other income?”

A small loyal audience can outperform a larger casual one

Under the standard pro-rata model, an artist’s income depends on their share of total listening in a territory. That tends to reward large volume. But artist-centred and fan-powered models highlight a different value: dedicated listeners who repeatedly choose an artist, follow releases and support them beyond passive playlist exposure.

This is why streaming revenue should be understood as part of a wider artist economy rather than the whole career. Streams can signal demand, feed discovery, support catalogue income and prove international traction. Yet for many musicians, sustainable income still depends on combining streaming with publishing, live performance, merchandise, direct fan support, sync licensing, physical formats and teaching or production work.

The scale problem also explains why per-stream averages cause frustration. A listener may imagine their subscription directly funding the artists they personally love. Under the dominant pooled model, however, that subscription contributes to a wider revenue pool divided by total market share. A fan who listens almost exclusively to small artists may still be participating in a system where the biggest share of pooled revenue goes to the most streamed catalogue overall, unless the platform uses a user-centric or fan-powered model. [SoundCloud Community]community.soundcloud.comSource details in endnotes.

The shortest useful way to read a streaming statement

For artists and managers, a streaming royalty statement is most useful when read as a chain of questions rather than a single total.

First, identify which right is being reported. Is the statement for master income, publishing income, mechanical royalties, performance royalties or neighbouring rights? A distributor statement does not usually show everything a songwriter is owed.

Second, check which territory and platform produced the income. Streams from different countries and service tiers can carry different values because the revenue pools differ.

Third, examine the deal terms. Distributor commission, label royalty rate, producer points, featured-artist splits, publisher share, management commission and recoupment can all affect what reaches the artist.

Fourth, confirm the metadata and registrations. Wrong songwriter splits, missing International Standard Recording Codes, inconsistent artist names, unregistered compositions and unmatched publishing data can delay or misdirect royalties.

Finally, compare the income with listening behaviour, not only stream totals. Repeat listening, saved tracks, follower growth, playlist source, territory mix and catalogue depth can tell an artist whether streaming is building a durable audience or merely producing a temporary spike.

What streaming has clarified and what it has not

Streaming has made recorded music income more transparent in some ways. Artists can see listening by territory, track, platform and period with a level of detail that was impossible in the CD era. Global discovery is faster. Independent distribution is easier. A song can earn across borders for years without needing physical stock.

But streaming has not made music payment simple. It has exposed how many people and rights sit behind a single track. A play can generate recording royalties, mechanical royalties, performance royalties and sometimes other related income. Each may be collected by a different organisation, calculated under different rules and paid through a different contract.

That is why “how much does an artist get per stream?” is usually the wrong first question. The better question is: who owns the recording, who wrote the song, where was it streamed, what kind of listener generated the revenue, which platform rules applied, what intermediaries handled the money, and what contracts determine the final split? Only after those questions are answered does the stream become artist income.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to How Streaming Money Actually Reaches Artists. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

All You Need to Know About the Music Business

By Donald S. Passman

Explains the complete path from stream to artist payment.

See on Amazon

Book

Music Business Handbook and Career Guide

By David Baskerville, Tim Baskerville

Covers rights holders, labels, publishers, and royalty chains.

See on Amazon

Book

The Music Industry Handbook

By Paul Rutter

Examines streaming business models and revenue structures.

See on Amazon

Book

Business Basics for Musicians

By Bobby Borg

Helps artists understand how music income reaches them.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon: All You Need to Know About the Music Business Music Business and Career books The Music Industry books

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Shop location

Using USA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Example eBay listing

Rock and Roll 100PCS Trendy Music Band Stickers Packs for Adults Teens, Vinyl Wa

Search eBay.co.uk: music sticker pack

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

50x Glossy Music Note Stickers For Laptop Guitar Scrapbooking Sticker Bomb Pack

Search eBay.co.uk: music sticker pack

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

20 Guitar Rock Music Vinyl Sticker Pack - Waterproof Decals - Peel & Stick

Search eBay.co.uk: music sticker pack

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

15x Glossy Music Note Stickers For Laptop Guitar Scrapbooking Sticker Bomb Pack

Search eBay.co.uk: music sticker pack

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Browse more on eBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: artists.spotify.com
   Link: https://artists.spotify.com/en/royalties-guide
   Source snippet

   Spotify for ArtistsRoyalties GuideWe pay rightsholders based on streamshare — their share of total streams in a given month. E.g., if an...

2. Source: themlc.com
   Link: https://www.themlc.com/digital-music-royalties-landscape
   Source snippet

   The Digital Music Royalties LandscapeThe MLC collects digital audio mechanical royalties from eligible streaming and download services in...

3. Source: artists.spotify.com
   Title: for Artists Collecting Mechanical Royalties Can Be Tricky
   Link: https://artists.spotify.com/blog/collecting-mechanical-royalties-can-be-tricky-the-mlc-is-here-to-fix-that
   Source snippet

   The MLC...21 Mar 2022 — The mechanical royalty has to do with the digital reproduction of the musical work embodied in the audio file, a...

4. Source: themlc.com
   Link: https://www.themlc.com/

5. Source: ifpicr.cz
   Title: global music report 2025
   Link: https://ifpicr.cz/global_music_report_2025

6. Source: ifpi.org
   Link: https://www.ifpi.org/global-music-report-2026-global-recorded-music-revenues-grow-6-4-as-record-companies-drive-innovation/

7. Source: newsroom.spotify.com
   Title: How the Music Industry’s Cultural and Financial Impact
   Link: https://newsroom.spotify.com/2025-03-12/beyond-profits-how-the-music-industrys-cultural-and-financial-impact-define-its-success-in-2025/

8. Source: committees.parliament.uk
   Link: https://committees.parliament.uk/work/646/economics-of-music-streaming/news/156593/mps-call-for-a-complete-reset-of-music-streaming-to-fairly-reward-performers-and-creators/

9. Source: soundexchange.com
   Link: https://www.soundexchange.com/frequently-asked-questions/

10. Source: artists.spotify.com
    Title: modernizing our royalty system
    Link: https://artists.spotify.com/blog/modernizing-our-royalty-system

11. Source: support.deezer.com
    Title: Support Artist-Centric Payment Model (ACPS)
    Link: https://support.deezer.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360002471277-Artist-Centric-Payment-Model-ACPS

12. Source: help.soundcloud.com
    Link: https://help.soundcloud.com/hc/en-us/articles/1260801306810-Fan-powered-Royalties

13. Source: community.soundcloud.com
    Link: https://community.soundcloud.com/fanpoweredroyalties

14. Source: ifpi.org
    Title: GMR2025 SOTI
    Link: https://www.ifpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/GMR2025_SOTI.pdf

15. Source: ifpi.org
    Title: GMR2026 SOTI2
    Link: https://www.ifpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/GMR2026_SOTI2.pdf

16. Source: soundexchange.com
    Link: https://www.soundexchange.com/what-we-do/for-artists-labels-and-producers/

17. Source: soundexchange.com
    Link: https://www.soundexchange.com/

18. Source: support.spotify.com
    Title: understanding spotify royalties
    Link: https://support.spotify.com/us/artists/article/understanding-spotify-royalties/

19. Source: help.soundcloud.com
    Title: 1260801306810 Fan powered Royalties
    Link: https://help.soundcloud.com/hc/de/articles/1260801306810-Fan-powered-Royalties

20. Source: support.tunecore.com
    Title: 360052000051 What is the Mechanical Licensing Collective MLC
    Link: https://support.tunecore.com/hc/en-us/articles/360052000051-What-is-the-Mechanical-Licensing-Collective-MLC

21. Source: deezer.com
    Link: https://www.deezer.com/explore/artist-remuneration/

22. Source: ft.com
    Link: https://www.ft.com/content/3824c37d-1c16-4da2-809c-c683790ed114

23. Source: prsformusic.com
    Link: https://www.prsformusic.com/

24. Source: soundcharts.com
    Title: digital performance royalties
    Link: https://soundcharts.com/en/blog/digital-performance-royalties

25. Source: loudandclear.byspotify.com
    Title: Loud and Clear Takeaways
    Link: https://loudandclear.byspotify.com/takeaways/

26. Source: orphiq.com
    Title: soundexchange digital royalties
    Link: https://orphiq.com/resources/soundexchange-digital-royalties

27. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/TheBoardroom/posts/spotify-paid-out-a-record-11-billion-to-the-music-industry-in-2025-bringing-the-/1414270324045770/

28. Source: instagram.com
    Link: https://www.instagram.com/p/DVvk02mDuKR/

29. Source: loudandclear.byspotify.com
    Link: https://loudandclear.byspotify.com/

30. Source: royaltyexchange.com
    Title: mechanical royalties
    Link: https://royaltyexchange.com/blog/mechanical-royalties

31. Source: musosoup.com
    Link: https://musosoup.com/blog/spotify-royalties-per-stream

32. Source: boost-collective.com
    Title: spotify royalty calculator free
    Link: https://www.boost-collective.com/blog/spotify-royalty-calculator-free

33. Source: aepo-artis.org
    Title: spotifys loud but not so clear
    Link: https://www.aepo-artis.org/spotifys-loud-but-not-so-clear/

34. Source: rollingstone.com
    Title: spotify streaming royalties change streaming fraud 1234890236
    Link: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/spotify-streaming-royalties-change-streaming-fraud-1234890236/

35. Source: variety.com
    Link: https://variety.com/2026/digital/news/spotify-says-more-than-1500-artists-earned-1-million-in-royalties-2025-1236684566/

36. Source: wlv.openrepository.com
    Link: https://wlv.openrepository.com/server/api/core/bitstreams/227b16ad-7dff-43cd-9465-675eed22da24/content

Additional References

1. Source: ipbusinessacademy.org
   Title: economics of streaming the rise of the music artists rights and compensation
   Link: https://ipbusinessacademy.org/economics-of-streaming-the-rise-of-the-music-artists-rights-and-compensation
   Source snippet

   Further, they argued the royalties record...Read more...

2. Source: musicbusinessworldwide.com
   Link: https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/80-artists-generated-10m-each-from-spotify-last-year-1500-generated-1m-heres-the-full-breakdown/

3. Source: analog.com
   Link: https://www.analog.com/en/lp/001/beginners-guide-to-dsp.html

4. Source: reddit.com
   Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/deezer/comments/1in2clb/artistcentric_payment_thoughts/

5. Source: dijkmansguitars.com
   Link: https://dijkmansguitars.com/en/collections/paul-reed-smith?srsltid=AfmBOoqPeIXJi6f2TLf_S73IJ3_OnhcXFX8akebYo61alqQVIhXjIU8B

6. Source: mpaonline.org.uk
   Link: https://mpaonline.org.uk/what-we-do/policy-outreach/economics-of-streaming/

7. Source: autosound24.nl
   Link: https://www.autosound24.nl/car-audio/dsp-versterkers

8. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/techtrendszambia/posts/technewsupdate-deezer-and-universal-to-launch-artist-centric-streaming-modeluniv/1000774257719705/

9. Source: linkedin.com
   Link: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dynamitri_how-can-artists-make-money-12-digital-activity-7435610280811712512-EaIb

10. Source: revelator.com
    Link: https://revelator.com/blog/how-music-streaming-royalties-work